the CDC is making sure that Wall Street bankers are getting first dibs...
TEXT
and
TEXT
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Capitalism Devours Itself by Andy K.
The new derivatives trading bill being debated in Congress is a toothless, spineless joke of a bill (authored by Dems) intended to provide oversight and transparency for the unregulated secret $600 trillion market for derivatives. And even after Treasury Secretary Geithner watered down the new bill with exemptions and loopholes for most of Wall Street, the House Republicans still voted against it, insisting that government intervention will, uh, suffocate free enterprise and, um, stifle innovation.
In my mind, regulating a secret $600 trillion market that killed Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, AIG, and ignited the biggest economic catastrophe since the Great Depression would be an uncontroversial bipartisan no-brainer that any semi-literate Congressman would support immediately. There are 2 obvious changes that could easily fix the derivatives market:
1) Every buyer and seller of derivatives must prove they have the cash to cover their bets.
2) Every derivative contract must be listed on an exchange. (An exchange is a clearinghouse where trades are made, the most famous examples being the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and NASDAQ).
The Big Banks hate both of these new rules, but they really hate Rule #2, the creation of an exchange exclusively for derivatives. And that has puzzled me, because every gargantuan American corporation you can think of (Exxon, Procter&Gamble, AT&T, WalMart) sells its own stock on the NYSE and capitalists love the NYSE. The purpose of an exchange is to provide transparency for buyers and sellers, which increases efficiency and reduces fraud. This is boring old-fashioned Capitalism 101 and it's not particularly radical; the NYSE has flourished since 1792, so what's the problem?
The problem is that the NYSE publishes the price of every stock! And the Big Banks do not want the prices of derivatives published. Because if the prices are published, then the investors who hire the Big Banks as brokers would realize they're being screwed by their own broker. The investors would shop around for better deals from brokers with lower fees and if there's one thing I know about Big Banks, it's that they hate lowering their fees.
Senator Maria Cantwell, (D-WA) explained it this way: "Wall Street has a lot of reasons for wanting to keep the unregulated derivatives casino open for business. Specifically, Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. analyst Brad Hintz recently estimated that Wall Street revenue from trading unregulated derivatives might decline by 15 percent just by moving trades to clearinghouses. That is because the current system enables banks to profit from secret pricing - pocketing the gap between what they charge customers and what they pay to hedge their trades. With transparent pricing and true competition on an exchange, higher gambling returns are much more difficult to achieve. Public disclosure of price data would also mean that dealers no longer had better price data than clients."
In other words, a market with secret prices isn't an honest market, it's a rigged market.
Prediction: rigged markets aren't sustainable. They collapse.
In my mind, regulating a secret $600 trillion market that killed Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, AIG, and ignited the biggest economic catastrophe since the Great Depression would be an uncontroversial bipartisan no-brainer that any semi-literate Congressman would support immediately. There are 2 obvious changes that could easily fix the derivatives market:
1) Every buyer and seller of derivatives must prove they have the cash to cover their bets.
2) Every derivative contract must be listed on an exchange. (An exchange is a clearinghouse where trades are made, the most famous examples being the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and NASDAQ).
The Big Banks hate both of these new rules, but they really hate Rule #2, the creation of an exchange exclusively for derivatives. And that has puzzled me, because every gargantuan American corporation you can think of (Exxon, Procter&Gamble, AT&T, WalMart) sells its own stock on the NYSE and capitalists love the NYSE. The purpose of an exchange is to provide transparency for buyers and sellers, which increases efficiency and reduces fraud. This is boring old-fashioned Capitalism 101 and it's not particularly radical; the NYSE has flourished since 1792, so what's the problem?
The problem is that the NYSE publishes the price of every stock! And the Big Banks do not want the prices of derivatives published. Because if the prices are published, then the investors who hire the Big Banks as brokers would realize they're being screwed by their own broker. The investors would shop around for better deals from brokers with lower fees and if there's one thing I know about Big Banks, it's that they hate lowering their fees.
Senator Maria Cantwell, (D-WA) explained it this way: "Wall Street has a lot of reasons for wanting to keep the unregulated derivatives casino open for business. Specifically, Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. analyst Brad Hintz recently estimated that Wall Street revenue from trading unregulated derivatives might decline by 15 percent just by moving trades to clearinghouses. That is because the current system enables banks to profit from secret pricing - pocketing the gap between what they charge customers and what they pay to hedge their trades. With transparent pricing and true competition on an exchange, higher gambling returns are much more difficult to achieve. Public disclosure of price data would also mean that dealers no longer had better price data than clients."
In other words, a market with secret prices isn't an honest market, it's a rigged market.
Prediction: rigged markets aren't sustainable. They collapse.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Why the Banks Are Worse Than the Oil Companies by Andy K.
Because at least the oil companies make useful, high-quality products
for consumers. I admit that killing the planet is inherently part of
the manufacturing process for oil, but at least the products that come
out of an oil barrel (plastics, agricultural fertilizers, gasoline)
are fantastic.
On the contrary, the products that banks make (loans) suck. Yes,
loans are necessary, but if your monthly payment is one day late, your
interest rate can jump from 7.9 percent to 29.9 percent overnight.
That product sucks. No other industry punishes its own longtime loyal
customer the way banks do. A loan that jumps to 29.9 percent is a
lousy loan. It's a low-quality product.
No mechanic ever told me that my car was damaged because I used
gasoline. Gasoline always works. Always. Simply put, the oil
companies have quality control, the banks don't.
for consumers. I admit that killing the planet is inherently part of
the manufacturing process for oil, but at least the products that come
out of an oil barrel (plastics, agricultural fertilizers, gasoline)
are fantastic.
On the contrary, the products that banks make (loans) suck. Yes,
loans are necessary, but if your monthly payment is one day late, your
interest rate can jump from 7.9 percent to 29.9 percent overnight.
That product sucks. No other industry punishes its own longtime loyal
customer the way banks do. A loan that jumps to 29.9 percent is a
lousy loan. It's a low-quality product.
No mechanic ever told me that my car was damaged because I used
gasoline. Gasoline always works. Always. Simply put, the oil
companies have quality control, the banks don't.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Lesser Evil blog entry from July 3, 2007
Thursday, September 10, 2009
appalling Michael Moore quote of the day
"Democracy is not a spectator sport, it's a participatory event,"
Michael Moore told a news conference. "If we don't participate in it,
it ceases to be a democracy. So Obama will rise or fall based not so
much on what he does but on what we do to support him."
Michael Moore told a news conference. "If we don't participate in it,
it ceases to be a democracy. So Obama will rise or fall based not so
much on what he does but on what we do to support him."
Friday, August 14, 2009
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Sarah Palin critiques Obama's health care plan
PALIN: "The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,' whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil."
TEXT
TEXT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
